Legal Opinion

Orr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 2001No. 4D00-3844PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm as untimely that part of the appeal which seeks review of appellant’s 1995 conviction. To the extent Orr is appealing the denial of his trial court motion (whether it be a 3.800 or 3.850 motion) directed to his 1999 revocation of probation and resulting sentences, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice. Orr already has pending in this court direct appeals of those revocations in case numbers 4D99-4339, 4D99-4340, and 4D99-4341. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) and 3.800 and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h), 9.14-0, and 9.600, 761 So.2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800Supreme Court of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salczman v. JoquielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API