Legal Opinion

United States v. Los Angeles Trading Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1925No. 2604PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved in. this appeal is an alcoholic compound manufactured by the Chinese and known as Ng-ka-py. The alco*331holic proof of the article is approximately 100 degrees. -What proportion is alcohol or what its other ingredients are, other than that they are regarded by the Chinese as medicinal, does not appear.

It was entered for warehouse at Los Angeles, Calif., April 21, 1922.

Samples were submitted to a Government chemist who reported that it was not sufficiently medicated to render it unfit for use as a beverage.

Importer was so informed and requested to increase the amount of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Central Commodities Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. S. Stern, Henry & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Sucrest Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. United States v. Lo CurtoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API