Legal Opinion · Dissent

Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York, Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 2013Published

1DissentGische, J.

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the order and judgment of the motion court. The court properly exercised its discretion in granting petitioner’s motion for injunctive relief in aid of arbitration, enjoining respondents from terminating or revoking the release time previously issued to the individual petitioners pursuant to New York City Executive Order No. 75 of 1973 (as amended by NY City Executive Order No. 6 of 1974) (EO 75) (see CPLR 7502 [c]; Kalyanaram v New York Inst. of Tech., 63 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2009]; Matter of H.I.G. Capital Mgt. v Ligator, 233 AD2d 270 [1st Dept…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. H. I. G. Capital Management, Inc. v. LigatorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Datwani v. DatwaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Kalyanaram v. New York Institute of TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API