Legal Opinion

DeCandia v. Hudson Waterways, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Dontzin, J.), entered August 25, 1989, which dismissed the complaint and third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appeal from the order of the same court, entered on or about May 17, 1989, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendants, is dismissed as superceded by the appeal from the judgment (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248), without costs.

The various points of error raised by plaintiff are all without merit. The action was properly dismissed as against the time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. LaGrega v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Boulware v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API