Rodgers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, ninety-nine years imprisonment. 1
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. A statement of facts will be omitted.
The appellant alleges seven grounds of error, but cites not a single case in their support.
The first ground of error is that the prosecution was permitted to ask appellant’s mother, whom the appellant offered as a witness, 2 the question, “The last time you were at the courthouse, you and your other son didn’t threaten Mr. Lucas and I ? ” The witness denied such threats. The court overruled…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Kampmann v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Albiar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.