Legal Opinion

Tate v. Security Trust Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 26, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, V. C.

On February 2d, 1900, Charles S. and William Solomon entered into a written agreement with Samuel H. Tate, the terms of which were that the Solomons would sell the San Marcos Hotel, in Atlantic City, to Tate for $50,000, free of encumbrances, except a $15,000 mortgage. The consideration to be paid to the Solomons was in the shape of certain properties that were to be conveyed to them by Tate and a promissory note of $3,000 *560made by Tate. It was also agreed that, to enable the Solomons to raise money upon the $3,000 note, for the payment of taxes and for other payments, Mr. Tate was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Knowles Loom Works v. VacherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
  3. Broad & Market National Bank v. LarsenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sabatino v. D'AloiseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. George F. Perry Son v. MandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Zane v. BrownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API