Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 8, 1995No. 2-89-303-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Appellant Roy Lee Hubbard was found guilty by a jury of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. At punishment, the jury found the enhancement paragraphs true, made an affirmative finding of a deadly weapon, and assessed a life sentence. The conviction was affirmed by this court, but reversed and remanded by the court of criminal appeals for reconsideration in light of Grunsfeld v. State, 843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). See Hubbard v. State, 809 S.W.2d 316 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1991), rev’d, 892 S.W.2d 909, 911 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). In Grunsfeld,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Kessler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Voisine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Persimmon Ridge Partners EO, L.P., Russ Vandenburg, and Martha Vandenburg v. Fannie MaeTexas Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API