Legal Opinion

People v. Petersen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in allowing the prosecution to exploit the fact that defendant had not told the police, the Judge, the District Attorney and the Grand Jury that he was not driving his car at the time he was so charged, but that it had been driven by someone else. Defendant was under no duty to speak when in the custody of the authorities, and his failure to do so cannot be the basis of an inference of guilt on his part (People v. Rutigliano, 261 N. Y. 103, 106-107; People v. Dolce, 261 N. Y. 108; People v. Travato, 309 N. Y. 382, 386; People v. Namer, 309 N.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MleczkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. People v. RutiglianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. People v. PignataroNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. People v. TravatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Parker v. McMannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Frank Campanale v. David R. Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. People v. ConyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API