Legal Opinion

Bariso v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 2009No. 06-71807Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Danilo Basmayor Bariso, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for re*541view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“I J”) decision denying Bariso’s application for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 237(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review the statutory eligibility elements of a waiver of inadmissibility under section 237(a)(1)(H). See San Pedro v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1156, 1157 (9th Cir.2005). We review de novo questions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edmer Rogelio Cabrera-Alvarez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Deoderico Polintan San Pedro v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Maksim Milutin Kalezic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API