Legal Opinion

Stinson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1932No. 14381Published

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION TO FILE SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The facts, issues and legal questions were examined and epitomized in the original opinion so far as this court was capable of doing so.

The facts in the case of Reed v. State, 119 Texas Crim. Rep., 459, 46 S. W. (2d) 319, to which the appellant refers, distinguish it from those controlling in the present appeal.

The appellant’s misunderstanding.of state’s counsel before' this court is ■evident. State’s counsel in his brief did not concede or intimate that the evidence on the issue of self-defense was conclusive…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API