Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v. Telesco Fuel & Mason Material Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS F. MURPHY, District Judge.
Respondent’s motion to quash the service of a citation on it at Stamford, Connecticut, is granted.
Libelant filed in this court an in personam libel against respondent. Although the libel contained a request for a clause for foreign attachment it is conceded that process was never served within this district either on the respond- ■ ent or on any property belonging to it. Parenthetically, the libel artfully does not *188comply with Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 42, 28 U.S.C.A., in that it does not give the name and place of residence of the respondent so far as known.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Andrew Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Lake Transfer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hunt v. Paco Tankers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1964