Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 30, 2006No. 26159PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
369 S.C. 69 (2006)
631 S.E.2d 86
Ex parte HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC., d/b/a WYFF TV-4, and The Greenville News, a division of the Gannett Pacific Corporation, Intervenors-Appellants,
In re The State,
v.
Charles Christopher Williams, Both of Whom are, Respondents.
No. 26159.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard May 3, 2006.
Decided May 30, 2006.
Carl F. Muller and Wallace K. Lightsey, both of Wyche Burgess Freeman & Parham, of Greenville, and Rivers S. Stilwell, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, of Greenville, for Appellants.
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Jeroid J. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023