Legal Opinion

Ross v. Richardson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1970No. Docket 7470PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

This negligence action, tried without a jury, resulted in a six-cent damage award for the plaintiff. Defendant admitted she had driven into the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle but contested the amount of damages alleged by plaintiff at trial level. Plaintiff appeals the six-cent award on the basis that it was clearly inadequate.

It is elementary that credibility of witnesses, resolution of factual conflicts and the weight accorded the testimony of witnesses rests with the trier of fact (Erickson v. Soyars [1959], 356 Mich 64; Graham v. Thorman [1958], 354 Mich 629) and that findings of fact will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitson v. Whiteley Poultry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Erickson v. SoyarsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Graham v. ThormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Hugener v. MichlapMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown Bros. Equipment Co. v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Greenleaf v. Department of State Highways & TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Barger v. GalazenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API