Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Rich

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1929No. File No. 6302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Commercial National Bank of Sturgis and First State Bank of Piedmont will be referred to in this opinion as Sturgis bank and Piedmont bank respectively. Defendant Rich was not served and made no appearance in the action.

M. M. Brown was president and chief executive officer of Sturgis 'bank, and he and defendants in this action were officers *293and directors of Piedmont bank. The statute forbids a bank to loan to one person or firm more than 20 per cent of its combined capital and surplus. In 1919 Sturgis bank had more money on hand than it could get loaned out, and Piedmont bank had customers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frost v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Mineral WellsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Commercial Bank v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Mineral Wells v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Merchants State Bank v. Sunset Orchard Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dove Creek State Bank v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. Citizens State Bank v. RosenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wolfe v. KelleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API