Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2015No. 2013AP001532Published

1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, C.J.

¶ 96. (concurring). The majority opinion sets the question upon which Re/Max Select, LLC's entitlement to a broker's commission turns as: "whether the purchase contract between Ash Park and Alexander & Bishop constitutes an 'enforceable contract' within the meaning of the listing contract."1 I would phrase the question to be decided as follows: whether the listing contract between Re/Max and Ash Park, LLC, two sophisticated business entities, demonstrates that they agreed that closing on a sale of the listed property was not required before the right to a realtor's commission arose. I answer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Peter M. Chalik & Associates v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Grinde v. ChipmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Wauwatosa Realty Co. v. PaarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Anthony Gagliano & Co., Inc. v. Openfirst, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API