Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Palmer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1986No. 84-733Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKrivosha, C. J.

I concur in the opinion as adopted by the majority insofar as it concludes that no error was committed in finding Palmer guilty of first degree murder. I am unable to agree in all respects with the majority’s analysis of the penalty and must therefore concur in part and in part dissent.

In reaching that decision I am quick to acknowledge that the law is an art and not an exact science, and therefore honest disagreements may exist even among members of a court.

I further wish to point out, before undertaking an analysis of our differences, that my conclusions are not in any manner affected by…

2Cases cited127 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API