State v. Palmer
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKrivosha, C. J.
I concur in the opinion as adopted by the majority insofar as it concludes that no error was committed in finding Palmer guilty of first degree murder. I am unable to agree in all respects with the majority’s analysis of the penalty and must therefore concur in part and in part dissent.
In reaching that decision I am quick to acknowledge that the law is an art and not an exact science, and therefore honest disagreements may exist even among members of a court.
I further wish to point out, before undertaking an analysis of our differences, that my conclusions are not in any manner affected by…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.