Legal Opinion

Kirk Franklin Williams v. Fidelity Bank, et al.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 19, 2026No. 6:26-cv-01226Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KIRK FRANKLIN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-1226-AWM-BGS FIDELITY BANK, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS Pro se Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Arrest (Doc. 10) and a Motion to Amend to Class Action (Doc. 11). Neither motion, however, is specific as to the particular relief sought, making it impossible for the Court to grant them. The motions are DENIED. As to the Motion for Arrest, Plaintiff merely indicates that per Fed. R. Civ. P. 3, Defendants have “48 hours to comply upon receipt of this writing or be in contempt.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keehner v. DunnDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API