Legal Opinion

Miller v. Beadle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Clinton. (Smith, J.) Judgment creditor’s bill. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Complainant filed a judgment creditor’s bill on an execution, returned unsatisfied, against John A. Beadle, to reach securities transferred to Mrs. Beadle, as so transferred in fraud of creditors.

The case is purely one of fact. The court below found the transfer was not fraudulent. The testimony of both defendants shows it was made for a valuable consideration, and this is not contradicted. We are asked to infer fraud from some suspicious circumstances in spite of the testimony to the contrary. Upon a review of all the facts, we do not think the fraud made out.

The decree must be affirmed.

The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Timmer v. PietrzykMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Barrett v. LowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API