Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1935Published

1DissentBuford, J.

(dissenting in part). — I find myself unable to agree with my associates in whole, either in reasoning or conclusions by which they have reached the result of reversing the order of the Court below.

From the provisions of the Act which are fully set out in the majority opinion, it is observed that the purpose of the Act is to make it lawful, upon the payment of the required license, to operate in this State, first:

“Automatic coin-operating vending and amusement machines with premium features which may or may not vend for each coin deposited a standard article or merchandise having a recognized…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Yellow-Stone Kit v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  4. People v. Noelke & MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API