Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 2001No. 2001-K-0939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
hBAGNERIS, Judge.
Relator seeks to reverse the trial court’s ruling granting the defendant’s motion to suppress. Relator contends the trial court erred in finding no probable cause and granting the motion to suppress the evidence. We agree.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On March 14, 2001, the State filed a bill of information charging the defendant with possession of cocaine, a violation of La. R.S. 40:967(0(2). On March 19, 2001, he pleaded not guilty. On April 20, 2001, the hearing on the motions was held. The trial court found no probable cause, granted the motion to suppress evidence, and ordered…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- State v. HandyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. GreenberryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014