Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Ansell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 29, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.), dated September 25, 1992, as denied her cross motion for summary judgment and for disqualification of the third-party defendant as attorney for the plaintiff, and granted the third-party defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Because the issue of whether an attorney’s conduct constitutes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Smith v. Russell Sage CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Schauer v. JoyceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Sommer & SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Burmax Co. v. B & S Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leon v. ShmuklerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Koether v. GeneralowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. New York Site Development Corp. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Crimi v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Mosher v. BainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API