Legal Opinion
Texas Moline Plow Co. v. Kingman Texas Implement Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 29, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. T. F. Hash.
1Opinion of the Court
FLY, Associate Justice.
—The Kingman Texas Implement Company instituted suit against W. L. Hutcheson, J. H. Wright, Joseph Hugent and Joseph Edwards to recover of Hutcheson the sum of $3138, all of the debt being in the shape of notes, except the sum of $410.40 owed on an open account. It was alleged that the notes had been given for certain plows, buggies and agricultural implements sold by the plaintiff to Hutcheson under the following written agreement:
“It is expressly agreed that the title to and ownership of all goods shipped under this contract shall remain vested in the Kingman Texas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Willis v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Glasscock v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Hand v. ErringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Meyers v. Baylor University in WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Blumenthal v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Tyler County State Bank v. ShiversTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.