Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Roth
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 2019No. 2018-SC-000095-DGPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
"It is a dangerous precedent to permit appellate advocates to ignore procedural rules. Procedural rules 'do not exist for the mere sake of form and style. They are lights and buoys to mark the channels of safe passage and assure an expeditious voyage to the right destination. Their importance simply cannot be disdained or denigrated.' "1 "Enforcement of procedural rules is a judicial responsibility of the highest order because without such rules '[s]ubstantive rights, even of constitutional magnitude ... would smother in chaos and could not survive." '2
An Appellant's brief must have a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brooks v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing AuthorityKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Jason Dickerson v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Parker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Goncalves v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Anthony Ball v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
- Antoinette C. Taylor v. Redwood Holdings LLC D/B/A Hillcreek Leasings LLC and Hillcreek Rehabilitation and CareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
- Benjamin Ross Woodburn v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- Brandis Bradley, Individually v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel, Daniel Cameron, Attorney GeneralKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
- Brenda Killian as Administratrix of the Estate of Earl Settles v. Barbara RednourCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.