Legal Opinion · Dissent

Washington Medical Disciplinary Board v. Johnston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1983No. 48104-1Published

1DissentRosellini, J.

(dissenting) — The majority asserts that a reasonably prudent and disinterested observer would not be left with the feeling that a fair and neutral hearing is denied when, as here, the same tribunal combines investigative, prosecutorial and adjudicative functions. Majority opinion, at 481.1 disagree. I believe the unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals correctly found an appearance of fairness violation. For the reasons set out in the lower court opinion, as well as those discussed below, I would therefore affirm.

The appearance of fairness doctrine was first enunciated in Smith v. Skagit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State Ex Rel. Beam v. FulwilerWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Washington Medical Disciplinary Board v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API