Abreu v. Hogan

We affirm. The facility at which petitioner was incarcerated in April 2008 did not offer the sex offender counseling and treatment program, and petitioner was informed that, upon completion of his term in the special housing unit, he would be transferred to a facility that offered the program if his participation was deemed appropriate. In addition, the record demonstrates that petitioner’s mental health needs are, indeed, being addressed. As such, we cannot say that the Central Office Review Committee’s denial of petitioner’s grievance was arbitrary and capricious or without a rational basis…