Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
Plaintiff, Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad company, brings this action to recover federal income taxes paid by it for the taxable years 1964 and 1965. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(a) (1) and 1491.
Our decision is limited to the issues raised by the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and the plaintiff’s opposition thereto — namely, whether the amount of investment credit and depreciation deductions taken by the Railroad for the Cane Creek Branch for the taxable years in question was excessive. Both parties agree that the answer to this question depends…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crane v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Detroit Edison Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mayerson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Fox v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Estate of Baron v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Waddell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Jackson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Saviano v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.