Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Beyer

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 24, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

265 N.J. Super. 345 (1993)

627 A.2d 166

MAURICE TAYLOR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HOWARD L. BEYER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted April 6, 1993.

Decided June 24, 1993.

Before Judges MICHELS, BAIME and WALLACE.

Maurice Taylor, appellant pro se, filed a letter brief.

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Brett Rickman, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WALLACE, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Appellant Maurice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Avant v. CliffordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Perez v. NeubertDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russo v. NJ Dept. of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  2. Blyther v. NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Allah v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. BERNARD REID VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API