Anderson's adm'r v. Whitlock
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 85 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 1 Duvall, 20; Laughlin vs-. Dean. MSS. Opin.. Winter Term, 1863; Campbell vs. Anderson. CITED— Story on Agency, pp. 194, 195. 3 Chitty on Com. and M., chap. 3,pp. 216-21. Smith's Mercantile Law, 49. Paley on Agency, 3-4. Story on Agency, secs. 31, 32, 205, 229-30. 40 Law Library, p. 53 ; Keech vs. Sanford. 2 Johnson's Ch. R., 108; Hart vs. Ten Eyck. 29 vol. Law Library.
Read the full summary
CASE 85 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 1 Duvall, 20; Laughlin vs-. Dean. MSS. Opin.. Winter Term, 1863; Campbell vs. Anderson. CITED— Story on Agency, pp. 194, 195. 3 Chitty on Com. and M., chap. 3,pp. 216-21. Smith's Mercantile Law, 49. Paley on Agency, 3-4. Story on Agency, secs. 31, 32, 205, 229-30. 40 Law Library, p. 53 ; Keech vs. Sanford. 2 Johnson's Ch. R., 108; Hart vs. Ten Eyck. 29 vol. Law Library. Lindley on Partnerships, vol. —, pp. 176-7. 3 Met., 50; Fahnestock vs. Baily Sf Varnon. Hill on Trustees, 221 to 224. ' Act of Congress of July 13, 1861.…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Petees
Appellant’s intestate and appellees having purchased the Eclipse Mills, in Christian county; in March, 1860, entered into articles of copartnership for running and operating said mills for the term of three years, under the style and firm name of Anderson, Whitlock & Co.
The partners advanced an equal portion of the capital invested in the enterprise, and were to share equally the profits and losses, and stipulated, that, during the continuance of the partnership, amongst other things, they would exert themselves for their joint interest, profit, and advantage; that just and true books should…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Chambers v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918