Legal Opinion
Wonda Day v. Northern Indiana Public Service Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 8, 1999No. 19-1531PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Wonda Day found herself behind the eight ball in this employment-discrimination suit when her lawyer ignored the district court’s rule requiring all statements of fact in support of or opposing motions for summary judgment to be supported by citations to the record. Day’s lawyer submitted a narrative statement of facts that contained only a single citation, to the whole of one deposition. The district judge deemed this insufficient, observing that the function of the rule is to provide pinpoint citations so that the judge can find the facts readily; citing a whole…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nellie BRASIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEINEMANN’S INC., Bakeries, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- George SCHULZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SERFILCO, LTD., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Lita M. Filippo v. Northern Indiana Public Service Corporation, Inc., and United Steelworkers of America, Local 13796Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
3Cited by35 opinions
- Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Charles M. McDonald v. Village of Winnetka, Ronald Colpaert, Scott Smith and Mitchell S. KushnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Kenyon v. HandalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Citizens for a Better Environment v. The Steel Company, Also Known as Chicago Steel and Pickling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.