Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1990Published

1DissentCarro, J.

I respectfully dissent because there was not sufficient evidence from *167which the fact finder could conclude that defendant acted with intent to cause serious physical injury to the victim. Accordingly, since the circumstantial evidence adduced by the People was insufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, this element of manslaughter in the first degree, I would modify the judgment of conviction, to the extent of reducing it to manslaughter in the second degree, and remand the matter for resentencing.

Of course, in considering whether the evidence presented was legally sufficient to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. YazumNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. WayNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. RumbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API