Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Clark
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*285OPINION
By BARNES, J.
On the issue raised that there was a written extension of the time of payment to August 1, 1932, no such writing was introduced in evidence and on interrogation it developed that the plaintiff made no claim that any such writing was delivered to him. On the question of extension of payment the testimony of the plaintiff is as follows:
“Q. What was the last payment date that you made there?
A. May 5, 1932.
Q. What happened then between you and the Wurlitzer Company in regard to the purchase of this radio?
A. I went up and explained that I was out of work and did not expect to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bainum v. Midland Acceptance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932