Legal Opinion

People v. Solomon

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1973No. Crim. 23269PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, J.

Arnold Solomon was charged in municipal court with a violation of F’enal Code section 647, subdivision (e). That statute makes a person guilty of disorderly conduct: “Who loiters or wanders upon the streets or from place to place without apparent reason or business and who refuses to identify himself and to account for his presence when requested by any peace officer so to do, if the surrounding circumstances are such as to indicate to a reasonable man that the public safety demands such identification.”

The trial court sustained Solomon’s demurrer to the complaint and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Sabrina Fields v. City of Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation, & Vytautas MacKeviciusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API