Legal Opinion

Hudspeth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1950No. 11086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon an appeal from an order denying a petition for the vacation of a sentence under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, it appears that the appellants were sentenced for violation of a bank robbery statute, Title 12 U.S.C.A. § 588(.b). 1 The indictment contained two counts in pursuance of subsections (a) and (b) and the appellants were sentenced for the term provided by subsection (b).

The ground for the petition and principal basis for the appeal is .that the second count in the indictment failed to allege criminal intent. The argument is without merit. Since both subsections define but a single…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Davilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. James Francis Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. William Thomas ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. Ernest James ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API