Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Duffy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1893No. 389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Appellant sued appellee in trespass to try title to recover the lot in controversy. Appellee pleaded not guilty, and pleaded specially the facts stated in the conclusions of fact.

Conclusions of Fact.— 1. That appellee, D.uffy, prior to October 4,1883, was the owner of the premises in controversy, and on that day, in order to hinder and defraud parties who were about to sue him for damages for injuries done by him to the furniture in their house, he made a deed conveying it to J. T. Hathaway, who received the deed, knowing and participating in the fraudulent purpose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eastham v. RoundtreeTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hoeser v. KraekaTexas Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davies v. Texas Central R. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. LaForce v. BrackenTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bramlett v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Jordan v. MarcantellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Jamison v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API