State v. Milam
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ST. PAUL, Justice.
The defendant was tried for murder and convicted of manslaughter.
He complained, in arrest, of judgment, that at the time of his motion the only verdict appearing on the minutes was the simple word “Manslaughter,” which verdict was technically not responsive to the indictment. State v. Johnson, 46 La. Ann. 5, 14 So. 295; State v. Flanakin, 128 La. 455, 54 So. 940.
The trial judge, having observed this, asked the jury if it was their intention to find the accused guilty of manslaughter; whereupon thé jury, through its foreman, answered that it was their purpose to find the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- State v. FlanakinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- State v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972