Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2001No. A-00-511PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sievers, Judge.

The issue in this appeal is whether a warning from a dispatcher to a police officer making a traffic stop that the driver is “a 2CX,” which the officer testified means a “convicted felon that should be considered extremely dangerous,” justifies a pat-down search of the suspect. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968). The pat down turned up illegal drugs, and in the course of the pat down, the driver bit the officer several times. We hold that such “2CX” designation, standing alone, does not furnish a reasonable suspicion that the driver is armed…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. McRaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Graves v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. STATE v. NELSONCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. State v. CardonaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. VASQUEZ-ARENIVARNebraska Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. PulsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API