Frye v. Viacom, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Presiding Judge.
Claimant appeals the denial of his claim for workers’ compensation benefits by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). We reverse and remand.
At the hearing for compensation held on August 25, 1994, claimant and employer submitted an “Agreed Statement of Facts” and concurred that the sole issue was whether claimant’s “injury arose out of and in the course of employment.” The stipulated facts reveal that employer offered a parking program to its employees in Stadium Garage East, approximately two blocks from employer’s building. Employer negotiated…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West v. Posten Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Person v. Scullin Steel CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Cox v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Kunce v. Junge Baking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- State Ex Rel. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. LutenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Wells v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Willeford v. Lester E. Cox Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gaston v. Steadley Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Thomas v. Hollister, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999