Legal Opinion

State v. Berty

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 5, 2006No. 32522-5-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

147 P.3d 1004 (2006)

STATE of Washington, Plaintiff,

v.

Mark Edward BERTY, Defendant.

No. 32522-5-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

December 5, 2006.

Barbara L. Corey, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Mark Edward Berty (Appearing Pro Se), Olalla, WA, for Petitioner.

Randall Avery Sutton, Kitsap Co. Prosecutor's Office, Port Orchard, WA, for Respondent.

PENOYAR, J.

¶ 1 Attorney Stone Grissom appeals contempt sanctions that the trial court imposed for his conduct while representing Mark Berty on voyeurism charges. Grissom contends that the trial court erred in relying on its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pounders v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State v. HobbleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Darrion Holiwell, V. Grenadinah Dela LlanaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  5. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API