Legal Opinion

Marsch v. Lill

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1979No. 2-1278A449PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

Ursula Schiller, appealing from an entry of summary judgment against her in a proceeding to determine heirship, raises two issues for our review. We do not have jurisdiction to determine those issues belatedly raised in Schiller’s reply brief. Richardson v. Scroggham, (1974) 159 Ind.App. 400, 307 N.E.2d 80.

Schiller’s first contention is that the trial court should have declared her the sole heir of Voldemar Weber, her natural father, and should have entered summary judgment in her favor. The basis of this contention is that IC 1976, 29-1—2-7 (Burns Code Ed.) is in violation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Tekulve v. TurnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Burnett v. CamdenIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Richardson v. ScrogghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Roll v. MasonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greives v. GreenwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API