Legal Opinion

United States v. William Tompkins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 20, 1980No. 1209, Docket 79-1412PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:

The right of the accused to representation by competent defense counsel is so fundamental to a fair and just trial that we need not belabor its constitutional origin. Though the nature of criminal litigation is complex, some defendants insist, perhaps unwisely, that they do not need assistance in rebutting the prosecution’s claims. The law is skeptical of that choice, but recognizes the individual’s right to defend himself without counsel if the decision is made intelligently and voluntarily, with full knowledge of the right to counsel and the consequences of its waiver.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Thomas McKee v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. William Stewart McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API