Legal Opinion

Zuniga v. Schiller, Judge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1937No. 5841Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Chief Justice.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to require the judge of the district court, named as a defendant, to try the issues made by a counterclaim and reply thereto in a cause where a demurrer to the complaint was sustained and the complaint dismissed after a reversal of a judgment for plaintiffs on appeal. The parties hereto, the Zunigas and Leone, have been in the courts for the last seven or eight years attempting to settle the matters in controversy between them. Zuniga v. Leone, 77 Utah 494, 297 P. 1010, and Leone v. Zuniga, 84 Utah 417, 34 P. (2d) 699, 94 A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Leone v. ZunigaUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hardin v. EmmonsNevada Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API