Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jaycee Dugard v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2016No. 13-17596Published

1DissentSmith, Chief District Judge

As the majority states, our hearts are with Ms. Dugard. But for the incompetence of both California and federal officials, the unspeakable crimes committed by Garrido would never have occurred. Ms. Dugard has been compensated by California; and in my view she should have her day in court against the federal government as well. I differ with the majority’s conclusion that the law does not allow her this, and therefore I respectfully dissent.

The majority’s decision turns on its understanding that the most analogous California cases for the purposes of determining liability under the Federal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Whitcombe v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API