Legal Opinion

Compania Minera Ygnacio Rodriguez Ramos, S. A. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1925No. 3225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

For a statement of the case the following is quoted from the opinion of the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals:

“The Compañía Minera Ygnacio Rodriguez Ramos, S. A., brought this suit against the Bartlesville Zinc Company, American Metals Company, Ltd., The Compañía Minera de Penóles, S. A., and Compañía de Minerales y Metales, et ah, for damages for the conversion of forty-eight cars of ore, alleging that same was taken from plaintiff in the Republic of Mexico by un known parties, and shipped to El Paso, where it was unlawfully appropriated by defendants.
“The defense is that it was seized and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Thorington v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Williams v. BruffySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Sprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. City of Trinity v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. The FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. State v. SchlickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Tiedemann v. Estoduras Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API