Corp v. Vermilye
New York Supreme Court
SPECIAL bail having been filed in this cause, the defendant presented his petition, stating, that he was “ a resident of the state of New-Jersey, and that he was desirous of removing; the cause into the next circuit court ° . . of the United States, to be held in and for the district of New-Tork, in the second circuit,” and offered sufficient ’ ’ security for entering in the said court, on the first day of . . -i-t ,• , r its next session, true copies oí the proceedings, and…
Read the full summary
SPECIAL bail having been filed in this cause, the defendant presented his petition, stating, that he was “ a resident of the state of New-Jersey, and that he was desirous of removing; the cause into the next circuit court ° . . of the United States, to be held in and for the district of New-Tork, in the second circuit,” and offered sufficient ’ ’ security for entering in the said court, on the first day of . . -i-t ,• , r its next session, true copies oí the proceedings, and ror his appearance in that court, on that day, and entering spee e e cial bail m that court. moved, that the security…
1Per curiam
The defendant ought to have shown, that lie was a citizen of New-Jersey.
Motion denied.*
See 3 Dallas, 382. 2 Cranch, 1. 126.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1810
3Cited by3 opinions
- Suydam v. SmithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Fisk v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1871
- Ogden v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1832