Marks v. Foreman

(dissenting.) I am unable to concur in this opinion. Under section 6005, Rev. Laws 1910, the judgment of the trial court in this case cannot be reversed unless, after an examination of the entire record, it appears that the admission of the enrollment records in evidence “probably resulted in a miscarriage of justice,” as it is elear that its admission constitutes no substantial violation of any constitutional or statutory right. My own views as to the effect of this section of the statutes are fully set forth in my concurring opinion in the ease of Potter v. Womach, 63 Okla. 107, 162 Pac.…