Legal Opinion

East v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1959No. 2358PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner, as the result of his conviction of various moving traffic violations, accumu*634lated over twelve points” and after due administrative proceedings his operator’s permit was revoked.1

All of the questions raised by petitioner in his appeal have heretofore been decided by this court adversely to his contentions.2

Affirmed.. See Part V, Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.. See Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575; Tillman v. Director of Vehicles, etc., D.C.Mun.App., 144 A.2d 922; Daniels v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ritch v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic of D. of C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Glenn v. Commissioners of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Tillman v. Director of Vehicles & TrafficDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Lambert v. Board of Com'rs of District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Daniels v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic of D. of C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glover v. EnglandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API