Mogulewsky v. Rohrig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, William F. Rohrig, from a judgment of the Municipal Court, of the city of Hew York, borough of The Bronx, in favor of the plaintiff, entered, on the 21st day of May, 1904, upon the decision of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
This suit was brought to recover a ■ balance claimed for work, labor and services performed and materials furnished in the construction of a building. Such construction was provided for in a written contract under seal, executed by the firm of Gordon & Koslowitzky on the one part, and “ Katie Behrens pr William F. Rohrig, Attorney in fact,” on the other. The contract described W. F. Rohrig as superintendent, and required the work to be done to his satisfaction. . The plaintiff has succeeded by assignment to the rights of Gordon &' Koslowitzky. It will be observed that in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Adamson v. Alexander Milburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Simon v. EtgenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Dedona Contracting Corp. v. One Eleven West End Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933