People v. Baird
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The defendant was indicted for the
crime of forgery, the indictment alleging that he did, on or about August 20, 1891, “ fraudulently, falsely, and feloniously” “ make and forge a certain promissory note,” bearing date June 20,1891, and which promissory note is set out in the indictment.
The defendant was convicted of the offense charged, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Upon the trial the district attorney, for the purpose of showing guilty intent upon the part of the defendant, offered in evidence various other alleged forged notes, thirty-one in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crocker v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. McWilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- State v. CraemerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.