Legal Opinion
County of San Bernardino v. Way
California Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1941No. L. A. 17869Published
1Opinion of the Court
18 Cal.2d 647 (1941)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Petitioner,
v.
HOWARD L. WAY, as County Surveyor, etc., Respondent.
L. A. No. 17869.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Sept. 30, 1941.
Jerome B. Kavanaugh, District Attorney, Albert E. Weller, Chief Deputy District Attorney, O'Melveny & Myers, James L. Beebe and Ray H. Lindman for Petitioner.
Clyde C. Woodworth for Respondent.
CURTIS, J.
The petitioner, the county of San Bernardino, filed in this court its petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent county surveyor to prepare a diagram of the property included within Road Improvement…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Walker v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.