Satz v. Satz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action for divorce, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated November 17, 1982, as, pendente lite, (1) granted plaintiff (a) an order of protection and exclusive use and occupancy of the marital home, (b) exclusive use of the Lincoln automobile, and (c) temporary custody of the children, with *741visitation to defendant on a limited and supervised basis, and (2) directed defendant (a) to pay plaintiff $500 per week for maintenance and child support, (b) to keep current all payments for the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ahern v. AhernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Maratea v. MarateaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984